Skip to main content

Hidden Histories of Technology and Cybernetics in Latin America

Techno-oligarchs treat computation as a tool for consolidating power, extracting value, and scaling control — but there is a suppressed history where technology was imagined as something radically different, and this happened in Latin America.

In this piece for UMBAU, the online journal of HfG Karlsruhe, I trace how the region’s engagement with cybernetics was never a simple transplant of Western ideas into tropical soil, but an original intellectual project that integrated technology with local socio-political conditions in ways that remain remarkably relevant today — from Manuel Sadosky’s Marxist vision of computation as liberation in Argentina, to Waldemar Cordeiro’s pioneering computer art as a tool for social transformation in Brazil, to the Bariloche Foundation’s Latin American World Model, which challenged MIT’s «Limits to Growth» from the perspective of those already living in crisis.

Beyond these, the piece recovers lesser-known experiments like CENTRO in Peru — where exiled intellectuals attempted a «Model of Cybernetic Socialism» — and URUCIB in Uruguay, a locally built Executive Information System for the presidency that anticipated real-time dashboards and early warning detection decades before Silicon Valley made them standard. Where today’s tech billionaires design systems that make citizens into members of global digital platforms while eroding the capacity to ask structural questions about society, these Latin American projects sought the opposite: collective exploration, democratic participation, and local autonomy through cybernetic thinking. Perhaps what we have most lost is not the technology itself but the systemic perspective — the ability to recognise that what a system does, rather than what it claims to do, reveals its true purpose.

Read the full piece (open access)


Mariátegui, José-Carlos. 2026. «Hidden Histories of Technology and Cybernetics in Latin America.» UMBAU (Issue Five: Hide and Seek). https://umbau.hfg-karlsruhe.de/posts/hidden-histories-of-technology-and-cybernetics-in-latin-america.

Limitations of the Linnaean categorization model in the age of Al

Much of the current conversation around AI focuses on bias, ethics, and governance — but rarely does it dig into the history of categories themselves and their lasting impact.

In this paper in the Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society, Juan Cortés and I argue that Linnaean classification — rigid hierarchies and fixed labels — has quietly become the template for how we structure data, metadata, and annotation pipelines, systematically sidelining Indigenous knowledge systems that have understood nature as a living web of relationships for millennia. The categories shaping how we train models were designed in the 18th century to sort and control the natural world.

Drawing on Buffon’s dynamic vision of nature, Kakataibo taxonomies from the Peruvian Amazon, K’iche’ Maya maize cosmology, and other ethnobiological systems from Latin America, we argue why a new classification built on multiplicity, relationality, and cultural context, rather than fixed schemas, what we call rhizomatic hylomorphism, generates living maps where meaning emerges from relationships rather than predetermined labels.

Read the full piece (open access)


Cortes, Juan, and José-Carlos Mariátegui. 2026. «Limitations of the Linnaean categorization model in the age of AI.» Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society 2 (AI & Archives): e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/cfc.2025.10010.

Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society, Themed Issue: AI & Archives
Guest edited by Katie Mackinnon, Louis Ravn, Nanna Thylstrup Joo Eun Seo and Caroline Bassett.